Czechia vs Southern Africa: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 16.84 kg/ha against 7.09 kg/ha in Southern Africa, a difference of 9.75 kg/ha.
That makes Czechia's figure about 2.4 times Southern Africa's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 23rd and Southern Africa ranks 24th of 185 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.3 kg/ha | 3.68 kg/ha | 6.62 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 13.12 kg/ha | 4.04 kg/ha | 9.08 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 16.1 kg/ha | 5.12 kg/ha | 10.98 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 16.84 kg/ha | 6.75 kg/ha | 10.09 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Czechia or Southern Africa?
- Czechia, at 16.84 kg/ha against 7.09 kg/ha in Southern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Czechia and Southern Africa?
- 9.75 kg/ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Southern Africa?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Southern Africa rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 23rd and Southern Africa ranks 24th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).