Equatorial Guinea vs Eritrea: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Eritrea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 2.19 kg/ha against 2.1 kg/ha in Eritrea, a difference of 0.09 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 187th and Eritrea ranks 189th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.44 kg/ha | 2.53 kg/ha | 1.1 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 1.65 kg/ha | 1.8 kg/ha | 0.1513 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 2.02 kg/ha | 2.05 kg/ha | 0.0275 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 2.18 kg/ha | 2.1 kg/ha | 0.0774 kg/ha | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Equatorial Guinea or Eritrea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 2.19 kg/ha against 2.1 kg/ha in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
- 0.09 kg/ha, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Eritrea rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 187th and Eritrea ranks 189th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).