Eritrea vs Sudan: Outputs β€” Cropland phosphorus per unit area

Eritrea
2.1 kg/ha
in 2023
Sudan
1.95 kg/ha
in 2023
Eritrea rank
189th
Sudan rank
191st

Outputs β€” Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time

  • Eritrea
  • Sudan
1234199320082023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 2.1 kg/ha against 1.95 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.15 kg/ha.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Eritrea ahead.

Eritrea ranks 189th and Sudan ranks 191st of 201 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 2.09 kg/ha 2.2 kg/ha 0.1118 kg/ha Sudan
2020s 2.1 kg/ha 2.39 kg/ha 0.2948 kg/ha Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs β€” cropland phosphorus per unit area, Eritrea or Sudan?
Eritrea, at 2.1 kg/ha against 1.95 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs β€” cropland phosphorus per unit area between Eritrea and Sudan?
0.15 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Sudan rank globally for outputs β€” cropland phosphorus per unit area?
Eritrea ranks 189th and Sudan ranks 191st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs β€” Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs β€” Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).