Eswatini vs Myanmar: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Eswatini
- Myanmar
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 10.89 kg/ha against 10.57 kg/ha in Myanmar, a difference of 0.32 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 55th and Myanmar ranks 58th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Myanmar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.22 kg/ha | 2.76 kg/ha | 1.46 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 6.7 kg/ha | 3.3 kg/ha | 3.4 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 10.31 kg/ha | 5.31 kg/ha | 4.99 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 9.72 kg/ha | 6.56 kg/ha | 3.16 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 9.42 kg/ha | 10.96 kg/ha | 1.54 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 10.73 kg/ha | 11.6 kg/ha | 0.8678 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 10.99 kg/ha | 10.81 kg/ha | 0.1813 kg/ha | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Eswatini or Myanmar?
- Eswatini, at 10.89 kg/ha against 10.57 kg/ha in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Eswatini and Myanmar?
- 0.32 kg/ha, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Myanmar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Myanmar rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Eswatini ranks 55th and Myanmar ranks 58th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).