Grenada vs North Macedonia: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Grenada
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 6.59 kg/ha against 6.32 kg/ha in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.27 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 119th and North Macedonia ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.05 kg/ha | 4.87 kg/ha | 0.1793 kg/ha | Grenada |
| 2000s | 4.32 kg/ha | 6.08 kg/ha | 1.75 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 6.88 kg/ha | 6.88 kg/ha | 0.0068 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 6.66 kg/ha | 6.8 kg/ha | 0.144 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Grenada or North Macedonia?
- Grenada, at 6.59 kg/ha against 6.32 kg/ha in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Grenada and North Macedonia?
- 0.27 kg/ha, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and North Macedonia rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Grenada ranks 119th and North Macedonia ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).