Guinea vs Malta: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Guinea
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 3.73 kg/ha against 3.49 kg/ha in Guinea, a difference of 0.24 kg/ha.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 166th and Malta ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.03 kg/ha | 5.03 kg/ha | 4 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1970s | 1.2 kg/ha | 5.1 kg/ha | 3.91 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1980s | 1.48 kg/ha | 6.81 kg/ha | 5.34 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1990s | 2.12 kg/ha | 9.66 kg/ha | 7.53 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2000s | 3.07 kg/ha | 13.66 kg/ha | 10.59 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2010s | 2.99 kg/ha | 10.82 kg/ha | 7.83 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2020s | 3.36 kg/ha | 3.7 kg/ha | 0.3393 kg/ha | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Guinea or Malta?
- Malta, at 3.73 kg/ha against 3.49 kg/ha in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Guinea and Malta?
- 0.24 kg/ha, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guinea and Malta rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Guinea ranks 166th and Malta ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).