Haiti vs Tunisia: Outputs β Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs β Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Haiti
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 3.01 kg/ha against 2.99 kg/ha in Haiti, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 175th and Tunisia ranks 173rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 6 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.35 kg/ha | 1.39 kg/ha | 1.96 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1970s | 3.81 kg/ha | 1.95 kg/ha | 1.86 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1980s | 3.98 kg/ha | 2.1 kg/ha | 1.88 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1990s | 3.33 kg/ha | 3.17 kg/ha | 0.1562 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2000s | 3.27 kg/ha | 3.17 kg/ha | 0.0983 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2010s | 3.62 kg/ha | 3.5 kg/ha | 0.1131 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2020s | 3.08 kg/ha | 3.88 kg/ha | 0.7971 kg/ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs β cropland phosphorus per unit area, Haiti or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 3.01 kg/ha against 2.99 kg/ha in Haiti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs β cropland phosphorus per unit area between Haiti and Tunisia?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Tunisia rank globally for outputs β cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Haiti ranks 175th and Tunisia ranks 173rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs β Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).