Hungary vs Kiribati: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Hungary
- Kiribati
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 15.58 kg/ha against 14.99 kg/ha in Kiribati, a difference of 0.59 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 31st and Kiribati ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 5 and Kiribati in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.8 kg/ha | 4.2 kg/ha | 1.6 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 1970s | 8.56 kg/ha | 4.75 kg/ha | 3.81 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 1980s | 11.72 kg/ha | 6.56 kg/ha | 5.16 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 1990s | 10.22 kg/ha | 6.53 kg/ha | 3.69 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2000s | 11.65 kg/ha | 10.32 kg/ha | 1.34 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2010s | 13.88 kg/ha | 14.73 kg/ha | 0.8445 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 14.1 kg/ha | 14.25 kg/ha | 0.1516 kg/ha | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Hungary or Kiribati?
- Hungary, at 15.58 kg/ha against 14.99 kg/ha in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Hungary and Kiribati?
- 0.59 kg/ha, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Kiribati rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Hungary ranks 31st and Kiribati ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).