Israel vs Sri Lanka: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Israel
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Israel currently reports 10.31 kg/ha against 10.21 kg/ha in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.1 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Israel ranks 61st and Sri Lanka ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.61 kg/ha | 5.54 kg/ha | 1.08 kg/ha | Israel |
| 1970s | 10.48 kg/ha | 5.79 kg/ha | 4.69 kg/ha | Israel |
| 1980s | 12.82 kg/ha | 7.48 kg/ha | 5.34 kg/ha | Israel |
| 1990s | 10.09 kg/ha | 9 kg/ha | 1.09 kg/ha | Israel |
| 2000s | 10.18 kg/ha | 10.15 kg/ha | 0.0245 kg/ha | Israel |
| 2010s | 10.47 kg/ha | 11.05 kg/ha | 0.5783 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 10.94 kg/ha | 11.41 kg/ha | 0.4721 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Israel or Sri Lanka?
- Israel, at 10.31 kg/ha against 10.21 kg/ha in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Israel and Sri Lanka?
- 0.1 kg/ha, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Sri Lanka rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Israel ranks 61st and Sri Lanka ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).