Jordan vs Uruguay: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Jordan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 9.96 kg/ha against 9.75 kg/ha in Jordan, a difference of 0.21 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 21 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 71st and Uruguay ranks 69th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.51 kg/ha | 1.77 kg/ha | 3.75 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 1970s | 2.58 kg/ha | 2.75 kg/ha | 0.1679 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 2.98 kg/ha | 3.68 kg/ha | 0.694 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 5.03 kg/ha | 4.99 kg/ha | 0.0441 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2000s | 7.31 kg/ha | 7.25 kg/ha | 0.06 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2010s | 8.65 kg/ha | 12.48 kg/ha | 3.83 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 9.3 kg/ha | 12.88 kg/ha | 3.58 kg/ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Jordan or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 9.96 kg/ha against 9.75 kg/ha in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Jordan and Uruguay?
- 0.21 kg/ha, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Uruguay rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Jordan ranks 71st and Uruguay ranks 69th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).