Kazakhstan vs South Sudan: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 2.99 kg/ha against 2.95 kg/ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.04 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 163rd and South Sudan ranks 161st of 185 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.02 kg/ha | 2.45 kg/ha | 0.5703 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 3.24 kg/ha | 2.86 kg/ha | 0.3802 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Kazakhstan or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 2.99 kg/ha against 2.95 kg/ha in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Kazakhstan and South Sudan?
- 0.04 kg/ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and South Sudan rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 163rd and South Sudan ranks 161st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).