Kiribati vs Poland: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Kiribati
- Poland
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 14.99 kg/ha against 14.62 kg/ha in Poland, a difference of 0.37 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.
Kiribati ranks 32nd and Poland ranks 34th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.2 kg/ha | 6.9 kg/ha | 2.7 kg/ha | Poland |
| 1970s | 4.75 kg/ha | 8.35 kg/ha | 3.61 kg/ha | Poland |
| 1980s | 6.56 kg/ha | 8.76 kg/ha | 2.21 kg/ha | Poland |
| 1990s | 6.53 kg/ha | 8.78 kg/ha | 2.25 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2000s | 10.32 kg/ha | 9.48 kg/ha | 0.8411 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 14.73 kg/ha | 11.95 kg/ha | 2.77 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 14.25 kg/ha | 14.26 kg/ha | 0.0029 kg/ha | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Kiribati or Poland?
- Kiribati, at 14.99 kg/ha against 14.62 kg/ha in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Kiribati and Poland?
- 0.37 kg/ha, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Poland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Poland rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Kiribati ranks 32nd and Poland ranks 34th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).