Libya vs Sudan: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area

Libya
1.66 kg/ha
in 2023
Sudan
1.95 kg/ha
in 2023
Libya rank
194th
Sudan rank
191st

Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time

  • Libya
  • Sudan
0123196119922023

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 1.95 kg/ha against 1.66 kg/ha in Libya, a difference of 0.29 kg/ha.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 194th and Sudan ranks 191st of 201 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 1.83 kg/ha 2.2 kg/ha 0.3685 kg/ha Sudan
2020s 1.72 kg/ha 2.39 kg/ha 0.678 kg/ha Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Libya or Sudan?
Sudan, at 1.95 kg/ha against 1.66 kg/ha in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Libya and Sudan?
0.29 kg/ha, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Libya and Sudan rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
Libya ranks 194th and Sudan ranks 191st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).