Lithuania vs Seychelles: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Lithuania
- Seychelles
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 12.92 kg/ha against 12.24 kg/ha in Seychelles, a difference of 0.68 kg/ha.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Seychelles's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Seychelles ahead.
Lithuania ranks 37th and Seychelles ranks 40th of 186 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.93 kg/ha | 3.74 kg/ha | 0.1867 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 7.12 kg/ha | 4.14 kg/ha | 2.98 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 10.62 kg/ha | 9.49 kg/ha | 1.13 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 13.44 kg/ha | 11.54 kg/ha | 1.9 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Lithuania or Seychelles?
- Lithuania, at 12.92 kg/ha against 12.24 kg/ha in Seychelles as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Lithuania and Seychelles?
- 0.68 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Seychelles?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Seychelles rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Lithuania ranks 37th and Seychelles ranks 40th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).