Malta vs Mozambique: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Malta
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 3.81 kg/ha against 3.73 kg/ha in Malta, a difference of 0.08 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 163rd and Mozambique ranks 162nd of 201 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.03 kg/ha | 3.06 kg/ha | 1.96 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1970s | 5.1 kg/ha | 3.09 kg/ha | 2.01 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1980s | 6.81 kg/ha | 2.24 kg/ha | 4.58 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1990s | 9.66 kg/ha | 2.33 kg/ha | 7.33 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2000s | 13.66 kg/ha | 2.81 kg/ha | 10.85 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2010s | 10.82 kg/ha | 3.02 kg/ha | 7.8 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2020s | 3.7 kg/ha | 3.62 kg/ha | 0.0767 kg/ha | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Malta or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 3.81 kg/ha against 3.73 kg/ha in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Malta and Mozambique?
- 0.08 kg/ha, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Mozambique?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Mozambique rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Malta ranks 163rd and Mozambique ranks 162nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).