Melanesia vs Mexico: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Melanesia
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 8.18 kg/ha against 7.95 kg/ha in Melanesia, a difference of 0.23 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Melanesia ahead.
Melanesia ranks 95th and Mexico ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Melanesia averaged higher in 6 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.6 kg/ha | 3.83 kg/ha | 3.77 kg/ha | Melanesia |
| 1970s | 7.34 kg/ha | 5.13 kg/ha | 2.21 kg/ha | Melanesia |
| 1980s | 7.73 kg/ha | 6.31 kg/ha | 1.42 kg/ha | Melanesia |
| 1990s | 7.05 kg/ha | 5.68 kg/ha | 1.38 kg/ha | Melanesia |
| 2000s | 7.2 kg/ha | 6.35 kg/ha | 0.8567 kg/ha | Melanesia |
| 2010s | 7.89 kg/ha | 7.8 kg/ha | 0.0951 kg/ha | Melanesia |
| 2020s | 7.56 kg/ha | 7.93 kg/ha | 0.374 kg/ha | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Melanesia or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 8.18 kg/ha against 7.95 kg/ha in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Melanesia and Mexico?
- 0.23 kg/ha, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Mexico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Melanesia and Mexico rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Melanesia ranks 95th and Mexico ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).