Mongolia vs Sudan: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Mongolia
- Sudan
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 2.16 kg/ha against 1.95 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.21 kg/ha.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 188th and Sudan ranks 191st of 201 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.53 kg/ha | 2.2 kg/ha | 0.6659 kg/ha | Sudan |
| 2020s | 2.17 kg/ha | 2.39 kg/ha | 0.2253 kg/ha | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Mongolia or Sudan?
- Mongolia, at 2.16 kg/ha against 1.95 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Mongolia and Sudan?
- 0.21 kg/ha, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Sudan rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Mongolia ranks 188th and Sudan ranks 191st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).