Mozambique vs Tuvalu: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Mozambique
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 3.83 kg/ha against 3.81 kg/ha in Mozambique, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Mozambique ranks 162nd and Tuvalu ranks 160th of 201 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.06 kg/ha | 4.97 kg/ha | 1.91 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 1970s | 3.09 kg/ha | 3.59 kg/ha | 0.4989 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 1980s | 2.24 kg/ha | 3.8 kg/ha | 1.57 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 1990s | 2.33 kg/ha | 2.72 kg/ha | 0.3921 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | 2.81 kg/ha | 3 kg/ha | 0.1947 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 3.02 kg/ha | 3.07 kg/ha | 0.0478 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 3.62 kg/ha | 4.05 kg/ha | 0.4286 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Mozambique or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 3.83 kg/ha against 3.81 kg/ha in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Mozambique and Tuvalu?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Tuvalu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Tuvalu rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Mozambique ranks 162nd and Tuvalu ranks 160th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).