Nicaragua vs Qatar: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Nicaragua
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 4.54 kg/ha against 4.43 kg/ha in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.11 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Qatar ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 146th and Qatar ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 3 and Qatar in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.02 kg/ha | 13.36 kg/ha | 9.34 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 1970s | 5.08 kg/ha | 8.82 kg/ha | 3.74 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 1980s | 3.52 kg/ha | 2.42 kg/ha | 1.1 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
| 1990s | 2.42 kg/ha | 3.44 kg/ha | 1.02 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 2000s | 2.87 kg/ha | 3.5 kg/ha | 0.6229 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 2010s | 4.18 kg/ha | 2.61 kg/ha | 1.58 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 4.65 kg/ha | 3.78 kg/ha | 0.8667 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Nicaragua or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 4.54 kg/ha against 4.43 kg/ha in Nicaragua as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Nicaragua and Qatar?
- 0.11 kg/ha, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and Qatar rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Nicaragua ranks 146th and Qatar ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).