Angola vs Slovakia: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Angola
- Slovakia
How they compare
Angola currently reports 22,848 t against 22,031 t in Slovakia, a difference of 817 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Angola ranks 79th and Slovakia ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,787 t | 15,974 t | 12,187 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 7,858 t | 15,223 t | 7,365 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 16,351 t | 18,114 t | 1,763 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 21,531 t | 20,598 t | 933.25 t | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Angola or Slovakia?
- Angola, at 22,848 t against 22,031 t in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Angola and Slovakia?
- 817 t, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Slovakia rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Angola ranks 79th and Slovakia ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).