Azerbaijan vs Belgium: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Azerbaijan
- Belgium
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 18,085 t against 17,994 t in Azerbaijan, a difference of 91 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 92nd and Belgium ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Belgium in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11,120 t | 19,479 t | 8,358 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 14,093 t | 19,092 t | 4,999 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 18,280 t | 17,467 t | 813.12 t | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Azerbaijan or Belgium?
- Belgium, at 18,085 t against 17,994 t in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Azerbaijan and Belgium?
- 91 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Belgium?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Belgium rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Azerbaijan ranks 92nd and Belgium ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).