Belarus vs Kenya: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belarus
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 42,278 t against 40,317 t in Belarus, a difference of 1,961 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 49th and Kenya ranks 46th of 186 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30,901 t | 21,420 t | 9,481 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 34,797 t | 25,467 t | 9,329 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 40,401 t | 35,265 t | 5,135 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 40,784 t | 39,534 t | 1,250 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Belarus or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 42,278 t against 40,317 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Belarus and Kenya?
- 1,961 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kenya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Kenya rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Belarus ranks 49th and Kenya ranks 46th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).