Bhutan vs Puerto Rico: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Bhutan
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 343.97 t against 286.31 t in Puerto Rico, a difference of 57.66 t.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.2 times Puerto Rico's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Bhutan ranks 167th and Puerto Rico ranks 169th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and Puerto Rico in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 383.18 t | 2,801 t | 2,418 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 485.39 t | 1,303 t | 817.2 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 559.67 t | 699.97 t | 140.3 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 540.21 t | 359.59 t | 180.62 t | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 606.25 t | 257.4 t | 348.85 t | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 659.63 t | 267.88 t | 391.75 t | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 401.27 t | 278.07 t | 123.2 t | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Bhutan or Puerto Rico?
- Bhutan, at 343.97 t against 286.31 t in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Bhutan and Puerto Rico?
- 57.66 t, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Puerto Rico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Puerto Rico rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Bhutan ranks 167th and Puerto Rico ranks 169th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).