Bosnia and Herzegovina vs El Salvador: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 6,298 t against 5,290 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1,008 t.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was El Salvador ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 112th and El Salvador ranks 109th of 186 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,515 t | 5,777 t | 1,262 t | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 5,147 t | 6,473 t | 1,326 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 5,421 t | 6,551 t | 1,130 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 6,379 t | 6,419 t | 40.08 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Bosnia and Herzegovina or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 6,298 t against 5,290 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador?
- 1,008 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 112th and El Salvador ranks 109th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).