Botswana vs Kiribati: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Botswana
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 509.62 t against 432.28 t in Botswana, a difference of 77.34 t.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 165th and Kiribati ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Kiribati in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 246.91 t | 169.29 t | 77.62 t | Botswana |
| 1970s | 366.61 t | 180.32 t | 186.3 t | Botswana |
| 1980s | 284.7 t | 253.69 t | 31 t | Botswana |
| 1990s | 257.63 t | 239.57 t | 18.06 t | Botswana |
| 2000s | 235.09 t | 350.79 t | 115.71 t | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 295 t | 500.68 t | 205.68 t | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 600.07 t | 484.58 t | 115.49 t | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Botswana or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 509.62 t against 432.28 t in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Botswana and Kiribati?
- 77.34 t, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Kiribati rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Botswana ranks 165th and Kiribati ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).