Central African Republic vs Estonia: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central African Republic
- Estonia
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 7,590 t against 6,424 t in Estonia, a difference of 1,166 t.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 106th and Estonia ranks 108th of 186 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,409 t | 2,632 t | 222.9 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 2,903 t | 3,330 t | 426.66 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 5,149 t | 5,671 t | 522.04 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 7,276 t | 7,508 t | 232.88 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Central African Republic or Estonia?
- Central African Republic, at 7,590 t against 6,424 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Central African Republic and Estonia?
- 1,166 t, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Estonia rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Central African Republic ranks 106th and Estonia ranks 108th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).