Colombia vs Czechia: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Colombia
- Czechia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 48,343 t against 43,212 t in Czechia, a difference of 5,131 t.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 47th and Czechia ranks 50th of 201 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35,217 t | 34,596 t | 621.41 t | Colombia |
| 2000s | 39,613 t | 36,895 t | 2,718 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 41,791 t | 40,988 t | 803.14 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 46,886 t | 42,738 t | 4,148 t | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Colombia or Czechia?
- Colombia, at 48,343 t against 43,212 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Colombia and Czechia?
- 5,131 t, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Czechia rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Colombia ranks 47th and Czechia ranks 50th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).