Croatia vs Zimbabwe: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus

Croatia
13,514 t
in 2023
Zimbabwe
14,106 t
in 2023
Croatia rank
103rd
Zimbabwe rank
100th

Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Croatia
  • Zimbabwe
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 14,106 t against 13,514 t in Croatia, a difference of 592 t.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 103rd and Zimbabwe ranks 100th of 201 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 11,645 t 11,521 t 123.91 t Croatia
2000s 13,171 t 12,002 t 1,169 t Croatia
2010s 14,764 t 10,501 t 4,262 t Croatia
2020s 15,588 t 14,331 t 1,257 t Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Croatia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 14,106 t against 13,514 t in Croatia as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Croatia and Zimbabwe?
592 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Croatia and Zimbabwe rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
Croatia ranks 103rd and Zimbabwe ranks 100th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).