Cuba vs Honduras: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus

Cuba
7,938 t
in 2023
Honduras
8,290 t
in 2023
Cuba rank
117th
Honduras rank
114th

Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Cuba
  • Honduras
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 8,290 t against 7,938 t in Cuba, a difference of 352 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 117th and Honduras ranks 114th of 201 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Honduras Difference Ahead
1960s 16,039 t 2,597 t 13,441 t Cuba
1970s 21,620 t 3,157 t 18,462 t Cuba
1980s 25,873 t 4,084 t 21,788 t Cuba
1990s 19,289 t 5,029 t 14,260 t Cuba
2000s 15,883 t 6,187 t 9,697 t Cuba
2010s 14,810 t 7,733 t 7,077 t Cuba
2020s 9,126 t 8,141 t 985.17 t Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Cuba or Honduras?
Honduras, at 8,290 t against 7,938 t in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Cuba and Honduras?
352 t, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Honduras?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Honduras rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
Cuba ranks 117th and Honduras ranks 114th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).