Czechia vs Kenya: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechia
- Kenya
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 43,212 t against 42,278 t in Kenya, a difference of 934 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 50th and Kenya ranks 51st of 201 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 34,596 t | 21,361 t | 13,234 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 36,895 t | 25,467 t | 11,428 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 40,988 t | 35,265 t | 5,723 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 42,738 t | 39,534 t | 3,205 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Czechia or Kenya?
- Czechia, at 43,212 t against 42,278 t in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Czechia and Kenya?
- 934 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Kenya?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Kenya rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechia ranks 50th and Kenya ranks 51st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).