Czechia vs Serbia: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 46,245 t against 43,212 t in Czechia, a difference of 3,033 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Czechia ranks 50th and Serbia ranks 49th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38,061 t | 34,716 t | 3,345 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 40,988 t | 39,287 t | 1,701 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 42,738 t | 43,521 t | 783.05 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Czechia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 46,245 t against 43,212 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Czechia and Serbia?
- 3,033 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Serbia rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechia ranks 50th and Serbia ranks 49th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).