Dominica vs Montenegro: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus

Dominica
115.39 t
in 2023
Montenegro
100.27 t
in 2023
Dominica rank
175th
Montenegro rank
178th

Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Dominica
  • Montenegro
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 115.39 t against 100.27 t in Montenegro, a difference of 15.12 t.

That makes Dominica's figure about 1.2 times Montenegro's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Dominica ranks 175th and Montenegro ranks 178th of 201 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 93.11 t 133.86 t 40.76 t Montenegro
2010s 104.82 t 106.91 t 2.09 t Montenegro
2020s 113.31 t 104.12 t 9.19 t Dominica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Dominica or Montenegro?
Dominica, at 115.39 t against 100.27 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Dominica and Montenegro?
15.12 t, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Montenegro?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Montenegro rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
Dominica ranks 175th and Montenegro ranks 178th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).