Eritrea vs Jamaica: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus

Eritrea
1,454 t
in 2023
Jamaica
1,188 t
in 2023
Eritrea rank
148th
Jamaica rank
151st

Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Eritrea
  • Jamaica
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 1,454 t against 1,188 t in Jamaica, a difference of 266 t.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.2 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Jamaica ahead.

Eritrea ranks 148th and Jamaica ranks 151st of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Jamaica in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Jamaica Difference Ahead
1990s 1,157 t 2,150 t 992.95 t Jamaica
2000s 1,135 t 1,927 t 792.66 t Jamaica
2010s 1,416 t 1,350 t 65.95 t Eritrea
2020s 1,452 t 1,259 t 192.63 t Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Eritrea or Jamaica?
Eritrea, at 1,454 t against 1,188 t in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Eritrea and Jamaica?
266 t, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Jamaica?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Jamaica rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
Eritrea ranks 148th and Jamaica ranks 151st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).