Eswatini vs Mongolia: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Eswatini
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 2,486 t against 2,123 t in Eswatini, a difference of 363 t.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mongolia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 141st and Mongolia ranks 138th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 608.58 t | 1,055 t | 446.62 t | Mongolia |
| 1970s | 1,122 t | 1,410 t | 287.72 t | Mongolia |
| 1980s | 1,732 t | 2,653 t | 921.14 t | Mongolia |
| 1990s | 1,858 t | 1,502 t | 355.16 t | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 1,806 t | 796.12 t | 1,009 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 2,081 t | 1,943 t | 137.9 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 2,143 t | 2,461 t | 318.1 t | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Eswatini or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 2,486 t against 2,123 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Eswatini and Mongolia?
- 363 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mongolia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Mongolia rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Eswatini ranks 141st and Mongolia ranks 138th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).