Iceland vs Saint Lucia: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Iceland
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 41.06 t against 35.17 t in Iceland, a difference of 5.89 t.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 187th and Saint Lucia ranks 186th of 201 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.86 t | 149.32 t | 142.46 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1970s | 7.21 t | 147.63 t | 140.42 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1980s | 11.1 t | 140.38 t | 129.28 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1990s | 9.58 t | 134.47 t | 124.89 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 11.07 t | 64.7 t | 53.63 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 20.28 t | 48.13 t | 27.85 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 35.49 t | 45.35 t | 9.86 t | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Iceland or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 41.06 t against 35.17 t in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Iceland and Saint Lucia?
- 5.89 t, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Saint Lucia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Saint Lucia rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Iceland ranks 187th and Saint Lucia ranks 186th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).