India vs USSR: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- India
- USSR
How they compare
India currently reports 2.32 million t against 841,437 t in USSR, a difference of 1.48 million t.
That makes India's figure about 2.8 times USSR's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was USSR ahead.
India ranks 3rd and USSR ranks 5th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and USSR in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 511,143 t | 735,806 t | 224,663 t | USSR |
| 1970s | 655,688 t | 946,338 t | 290,650 t | USSR |
| 1980s | 848,005 t | 945,177 t | 97,172 t | USSR |
| 1990s | 1.04 million t | 967,008 t | 74,426 t | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, India or USSR?
- India, at 2.32 million t against 841,437 t in USSR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between India and USSR?
- 1.48 million t, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do India and USSR rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- India ranks 3rd and USSR ranks 5th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).