Kazakhstan vs Paraguay: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Kazakhstan
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 91,684 t against 87,893 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 3,791 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 33rd and Paraguay ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 62,084 t | 24,953 t | 37,131 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 69,275 t | 40,096 t | 29,179 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 89,187 t | 80,790 t | 8,397 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 96,595 t | 85,942 t | 10,653 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Kazakhstan or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 91,684 t against 87,893 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Kazakhstan and Paraguay?
- 3,791 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Paraguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Paraguay rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Kazakhstan ranks 33rd and Paraguay ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).