Kenya vs Serbia: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Kenya
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 46,245 t against 42,278 t in Kenya, a difference of 3,967 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Kenya ranks 46th and Serbia ranks 44th of 186 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27,519 t | 34,716 t | 7,197 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 35,265 t | 39,287 t | 4,022 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 39,534 t | 43,521 t | 3,988 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Kenya or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 46,245 t against 42,278 t in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Kenya and Serbia?
- 3,967 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Serbia rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Kenya ranks 46th and Serbia ranks 44th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).