Kyrgyzstan vs Rwanda: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 10,404 t against 9,445 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 959 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 113th and Rwanda ranks 111th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,135 t | 3,900 t | 3,235 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 9,403 t | 6,832 t | 2,571 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 9,433 t | 9,442 t | 8.66 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 9,689 t | 10,252 t | 563.67 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Kyrgyzstan or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 10,404 t against 9,445 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Kyrgyzstan and Rwanda?
- 959 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Rwanda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Rwanda rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 113th and Rwanda ranks 111th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).