Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Republic of Moldova: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
912,455 t
in 2023
Republic of Moldova
17,555 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
15th
Republic of Moldova rank
14th

Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Republic of Moldova
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 912,455 t against 17,555 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 894,900 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 52.0 times Republic of Moldova's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th and Republic of Moldova ranks 14th of 29 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 410,644 t 12,447 t 398,197 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 537,675 t 11,628 t 526,047 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 787,474 t 14,025 t 773,449 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 900,268 t 14,951 t 885,317 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Republic of Moldova?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 912,455 t against 17,555 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Republic of Moldova?
894,900 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Republic of Moldova?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Republic of Moldova rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th and Republic of Moldova ranks 14th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Republic of Moldova: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/outputs-cropland-phosphorus/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/republic-of-moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/outputs-cropland-phosphorus/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/republic-of-moldova/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Republic of Moldova: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).