Lesotho vs Polynesia: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Lesotho
- Polynesia
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 791.66 t against 610.58 t in Lesotho, a difference of 181.08 t.
That makes Polynesia's figure about 1.3 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Polynesia ahead.
Lesotho ranks 159th and Polynesia ranks 156th of 201 countries.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 838.06 t | 1,384 t | 546.01 t | Polynesia |
| 1970s | 786.01 t | 1,393 t | 607.08 t | Polynesia |
| 1980s | 633.08 t | 1,267 t | 633.85 t | Polynesia |
| 1990s | 674.13 t | 928.8 t | 254.67 t | Polynesia |
| 2000s | 539.83 t | 1,058 t | 517.97 t | Polynesia |
| 2010s | 517.61 t | 1,000 t | 482.55 t | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 453.12 t | 786.83 t | 333.71 t | Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Lesotho or Polynesia?
- Polynesia, at 791.66 t against 610.58 t in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Lesotho and Polynesia?
- 181.08 t, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Polynesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Polynesia rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Lesotho ranks 159th and Polynesia ranks 156th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).