Liberia vs Mauritania: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Liberia
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 2,071 t against 1,785 t in Liberia, a difference of 286 t.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Liberia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.
Liberia ranks 145th and Mauritania ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 6 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 812.13 t | 490.69 t | 321.44 t | Liberia |
| 1970s | 1,203 t | 298.73 t | 904.51 t | Liberia |
| 1980s | 1,448 t | 503.69 t | 944.39 t | Liberia |
| 1990s | 921.27 t | 799.28 t | 121.99 t | Liberia |
| 2000s | 1,314 t | 853.42 t | 460.17 t | Liberia |
| 2010s | 1,701 t | 1,376 t | 325.03 t | Liberia |
| 2020s | 1,802 t | 1,909 t | 107.43 t | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Liberia or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 2,071 t against 1,785 t in Liberia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Liberia and Mauritania?
- 286 t, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Mauritania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Liberia and Mauritania rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Liberia ranks 145th and Mauritania ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).