Lithuania vs Uganda: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus

Lithuania
30,177 t
in 2023
Uganda
32,549 t
in 2023
Lithuania rank
67th
Uganda rank
66th

Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Lithuania
  • Uganda
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 32,549 t against 30,177 t in Lithuania, a difference of 2,372 t.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uganda ahead.

Lithuania ranks 67th and Uganda ranks 66th of 201 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 11,357 t 19,028 t 7,671 t Uganda
2000s 13,362 t 25,644 t 12,282 t Uganda
2010s 23,652 t 29,041 t 5,389 t Uganda
2020s 31,108 t 34,839 t 3,731 t Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Lithuania or Uganda?
Uganda, at 32,549 t against 30,177 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Lithuania and Uganda?
2,372 t, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Uganda?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Uganda rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
Lithuania ranks 67th and Uganda ranks 66th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).