Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1.38 million t
in 2023
Russian Federation
746,592 t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
13th
Russian Federation rank
6th

Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Russian Federation
250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 1.38 million t against 746,592 t in Russian Federation, a difference of 638,288 t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.9 times Russian Federation's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 13th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 29 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 637,907 t 350,000 t 287,907 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 822,762 t 382,060 t 440,703 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 1.15 million t 508,558 t 644,169 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 1.35 million t 709,868 t 641,307 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Russian Federation?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 1.38 million t against 746,592 t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation?
638,288 t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 13th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/outputs-cropland-phosphorus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/outputs-cropland-phosphorus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/russian-federation-2/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).