Madagascar vs Uruguay: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Madagascar
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 22,299 t against 21,804 t in Madagascar, a difference of 495 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 83rd and Uruguay ranks 80th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7,529 t | 3,992 t | 3,537 t | Madagascar |
| 1970s | 9,224 t | 4,563 t | 4,661 t | Madagascar |
| 1980s | 10,450 t | 5,044 t | 5,406 t | Madagascar |
| 1990s | 12,046 t | 6,729 t | 5,317 t | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 15,247 t | 11,501 t | 3,746 t | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 18,482 t | 28,405 t | 9,923 t | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 20,410 t | 27,415 t | 7,005 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Madagascar or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 22,299 t against 21,804 t in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Madagascar and Uruguay?
- 495 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Madagascar and Uruguay rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Madagascar ranks 83rd and Uruguay ranks 80th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).