Madagascar vs Zambia: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Madagascar
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 22,119 t against 21,804 t in Madagascar, a difference of 315 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 75th and Zambia ranks 73rd of 186 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7,529 t | 3,005 t | 4,524 t | Madagascar |
| 1970s | 9,224 t | 4,806 t | 4,418 t | Madagascar |
| 1980s | 10,450 t | 5,129 t | 5,321 t | Madagascar |
| 1990s | 12,046 t | 5,561 t | 6,485 t | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 15,247 t | 7,799 t | 7,449 t | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 18,482 t | 16,153 t | 2,329 t | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 20,410 t | 19,327 t | 1,083 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Madagascar or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 22,119 t against 21,804 t in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Madagascar and Zambia?
- 315 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Madagascar and Zambia rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Madagascar ranks 75th and Zambia ranks 73rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).