Malawi vs Sudan (former): Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Malawi
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 36,834 t against 35,989 t in Malawi, a difference of 845 t.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Sudan (former) has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 63rd and Sudan (former) ranks 62nd of 201 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,032 t | 15,889 t | 10,857 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1970s | 7,035 t | 22,316 t | 15,282 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1980s | 7,818 t | 23,046 t | 15,228 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1990s | 9,821 t | 26,967 t | 17,146 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 15,957 t | 34,257 t | 18,299 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 23,561 t | 31,454 t | 7,893 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Malawi or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 36,834 t against 35,989 t in Malawi as of 2011.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Malawi and Sudan (former)?
- 845 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Malawi and Sudan (former) rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Malawi ranks 63rd and Sudan (former) ranks 62nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).