Malta vs Saint Lucia: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Malta
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 41.06 t against 30.89 t in Malta, a difference of 10.17 t.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.3 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Malta ranks 189th and Saint Lucia ranks 186th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and Saint Lucia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 75.65 t | 149.32 t | 73.67 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1970s | 70.31 t | 147.63 t | 77.32 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1980s | 88.59 t | 140.38 t | 51.79 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1990s | 106.44 t | 134.47 t | 28.03 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 130.57 t | 64.7 t | 65.86 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 111.55 t | 48.13 t | 63.41 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 32.27 t | 45.35 t | 13.08 t | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Malta or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 41.06 t against 30.89 t in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Malta and Saint Lucia?
- 10.17 t, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Saint Lucia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Saint Lucia rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Malta ranks 189th and Saint Lucia ranks 186th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).