Mauritius vs Solomon Islands: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Mauritius
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 857.84 t against 845.82 t in Solomon Islands, a difference of 12.02 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 153rd and Solomon Islands ranks 154th of 201 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,680 t | 473.81 t | 1,206 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 1,844 t | 600.41 t | 1,243 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 1,778 t | 845.17 t | 932.72 t | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 1,745 t | 896.08 t | 848.76 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1,599 t | 1,140 t | 458.53 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 1,264 t | 754.77 t | 508.84 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 850.54 t | 828.43 t | 22.11 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Mauritius or Solomon Islands?
- Mauritius, at 857.84 t against 845.82 t in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Mauritius and Solomon Islands?
- 12.02 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Solomon Islands?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Solomon Islands rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Mauritius ranks 153rd and Solomon Islands ranks 154th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).