Middle Africa vs Myanmar: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Middle Africa
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 132,300 t against 130,658 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 1,642 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Middle Africa ahead.
Middle Africa ranks 28th and Myanmar ranks 25th of 32 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Middle Africa averaged higher in 2 and Myanmar in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 31,109 t | 28,350 t | 2,760 t | Middle Africa |
| 1970s | 36,080 t | 33,358 t | 2,722 t | Middle Africa |
| 1980s | 39,293 t | 53,432 t | 14,139 t | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 49,968 t | 66,429 t | 16,461 t | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 63,303 t | 122,785 t | 59,482 t | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 108,721 t | 143,647 t | 34,927 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 127,734 t | 135,157 t | 7,423 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus, Middle Africa or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 132,300 t against 130,658 t in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus between Middle Africa and Myanmar?
- 1,642 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Myanmar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Middle Africa and Myanmar rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus?
- Middle Africa ranks 28th and Myanmar ranks 25th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).